cloudshovit wrote:I just find it a bit odd that you have been using FL for 2 years and yet all of the sudden decided that you no longer like its workflow. Anyways, I think you will run the risk of spending your time looking for and adjusting to another DAW this way instead of focusing on your music.
Thyrai wrote:As always, I'd recommend Ableton. It's got the fastest workflow of any DAW on the market (with the exception of Logic, but only because I haven't tried it yet) , and it has a nice clean and consolidated interface. It's also getting updated to version 9 soon, so it's on sale with a free upgrade at the moment.
ChocolateChicken wrote:Pro Tools is the fucking worst daw I've ever used and it's expensive as hell. Don't get it. Get a daw that's actually useful.
K3WRO wrote:Protools and Cubase, stay away from it
K3WRO wrote:ChocolateChicken wrote:Pro Tools is the fucking worst daw I've ever used and it's expensive as hell. Don't get it. Get a daw that's actually useful.
Protools and Cubase, stay away from it
there's really nothing wrong with FL studio, it's just that it lacks 64 bit support, and it's pretty annoying,
That being said, what does nOk write? Because I think Ableton's workflow is more suited to electronic music.
nOk wrote:So, with Ableton, is it good in general, or does most of its glory come from the "live music" aspect?
A major flaw that FL has, I guess, is not freezing tracks. I've heard that's pretty good.the4thImpulse wrote:These DAW wars are useless, there is almost no difference between the major DAWs except for Ableton's live performance features. Its all in workflow and image.
itroitnyah wrote:A major flaw that FL has, I guess, is not freezing tracks. I've heard that's pretty good.the4thImpulse wrote:These DAW wars are useless, there is almost no difference between the major DAWs except for Ableton's live performance features. Its all in workflow and image.
Cloud wrote:
I'll let you all know if I come out alive.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests