by Nine Volt » 10 Oct 2012 16:19
Eh, you and I have differing opinions. I agree that we should have genres, but they shouldn't be so rigid. Yes, some genres like house are practically built on being in that 128 area, but ones like dubstep are a lot more flexible. So what if a song is, say, 90 BPM? If it sounds like dubstep, it is dubstep (in my book).
You're right to an extent though, and I understand where you're coming from.
I tend to enjoy experimentation rather than sticking to the guidelines, so I often ignore or bend rules like BPM guidelines and such. Something standard is fine, but if we don't bend or break the rules then we will basically cease to develop new styles. Many, many, many genres were borne from experimentation and rule breaking in previous genres. For example, dubstep (old school style, not brostep) was (to my knowledge) born from a combination of dub and 2-step. Now, the genre has evolved into the robotic, massive, distorted clusterfuck that we all love, thanks to experimentation and rule breaking.
You follow that rule all you want, I'm content with basing classifications on how it sounds rather than the BPM.
Something that we can all probably agree on is that dubstep fans make too many subgenres :/
Also sorry for the massive post, as well as possible screw-ups/repetition. I'm literally just making this up and not looking back XD