CommandSpry wrote:srbija never explore pleasure of sit :(
Jokeblue wrote:You fool. You've doomed the Spam thread to yet another, inevitable :3 spam.
InC wrote:Malaria affects over 200 million people and kills between 600,000 to over a million each year, but as its vector species bite at night, this disease can be easily prevented by the use of cheap, long-lasting insecticidal nets. Indeed, as little as $3 allows the purchase of a net that will protect two people on average for 3 to 4 years, and the efficiency of these interventions have been thoroughly proven. The Against Malaria Foundation stands out in particular because of their strong track record and commitment to efficiency, program monitoring and transparency. More info on their website.
ganondox wrote:I'll see if I can make anythings that's not creepy, angry, or overly depressing, and of quality.
ganondox wrote:So does that mean they make sure people actually use their nets? That's what I want to hear. Anyway, I'll see if I can make anythings that's not creepy, angry, or overly depressing, and of quality.
Perhaps the following information, sent to a donor some weeks ago who had a similar question, might be helpful:
Q2. What purpose is your survey/registration data put to? It looks as if geared to verify that nets are going to those who need them, to verify that the nets are being used properly, and to track how many people the nets ultimately serve. Am I missing anything?
Re Q2, the aims of the data gathering are, in order of importance:
· ensuring no material theft of nets
- household level net need data gathered pre-distribution, via a comprehensive, distribution zone-wide Pre-Distribution Registration Survey (PDRS), gives accurate net need requirement per distribution point. Knowing exactly how many nets to move to each specific distribution point makes theft through the various stages of the supply chain much more difficult (and near-on impossible with the correct monitoring) and knowing exactly how many nets go to each beneficiary (household) makes theft very difficult at the distribution point level. Theft is an important issue.
· ensuring, and monitoring, continued net use
- regular (typically 6-monthly) post-distribution check-ups (of net use and condition) of nets in a material number of randomly-selected households (typically 5% of those households receiving nets), on an unannounced basis a) requires PDRS data to be gathered as that underpins the PDCU work so acts to achieve the theft related goals and b) seems to lead to higher levels of net hang up and use (‘behaviour change’) with this attributed to communities being aware there will be unannounced intervention to see if people are using the nets properly with householders being aware there is a reasonable chance their household may receive a visit.
· providing data-based information to health leaders to support decision making
- District Health Officers (DHOs) and Malaria Coordinators (MCs) are able to understand the level of net use and net condition to help with decision making, potentially very valuable when resources are scarce. For example, looking at the data for all 37 health centre catchment areas (HCCAs) in Ntcheu District, Malawi (and click on ‘24-month PDCU - Underlying data’) the DHO/MC is able to consider prioritising malaria education interventions, for example to achieve hang-up of ‘present but not-hung’ nets, in those nine HCCAs where the hang up levels – although high – are not at the very high level achieved in others areas.
· provide assurance to all parties, including donors, that nets reach recipients as intended and continue to be used so as to have the best possible impact on malaria.
- the costs of comprehensive (pre-distribution) and regular, sampling (post-distribution) data collection are modest and in our view clearly deliver value. Moreover, they can underpin the reduction of theft to immaterial levels, the single greatest factor that would otherwise compromise the impact a net distribution programme can have.
InC wrote:Please send an email to [email protected], with the subject “[ST]” followed by your username
DBMC wrote:When you say this, you are talking about our MLR username, right? (Just got a little tripped up there)
CommandSpry wrote:srbija never explore pleasure of sit :(
InC wrote:2. A lossless file (preferably flac or aiff) uploaded on a third party hosting service, not sent as an attachment. We tend to see a lot of Dropbox links dying when we need them, so please be careful.
DBMC wrote:SO PUMPED! Workin on a track for it already.InC wrote:Please send an email to [email protected], with the subject “[ST]” followed by your username
When you say this, you are talking about our MLR username, right? (Just got a little tripped up there)
hunterz263 wrote:InC wrote:2. A lossless file (preferably flac or aiff) uploaded on a third party hosting service, not sent as an attachment. We tend to see a lot of Dropbox links dying when we need them, so please be careful.
This one really confuses me... Do you mean posting the track on a site like Mediafire just like the MP3 or some other site?
InC wrote:DBMC wrote:SO PUMPED! Workin on a track for it already.InC wrote:Please send an email to [email protected], with the subject “[ST]” followed by your username
When you say this, you are talking about our MLR username, right? (Just got a little tripped up there)
DJ TATCM is right, though whichever name you usually go by online or you want to be credited as is fine as long as your preferred artist name is in the email.
hunterz263 wrote:InC wrote:2. A lossless file (preferably flac or aiff) uploaded on a third party hosting service, not sent as an attachment. We tend to see a lot of Dropbox links dying when we need them, so please be careful.
This one really confuses me... Do you mean posting the track on a site like Mediafire just like the MP3 or some other site?
Yes, I do mean sites like Mediafire, I'll make it a bit clearer in the OP. Thanks for contributing!
Return to Challenges, Contests, and Events
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests