Diss Order wrote:You can make variations on a theme in so many ways, there's endless possibilities. Of course it's
limiting; it's a PONY news site so IT HAS TO BE ABOUT PONIES. GOSH. You don't have to sample music to make it related. Using a theme =//= copy/pasting the show music in a sequencer and build a track around it...
Disagree here, but I don't think it's something we can resolve through argument, at least not without an example rejected song to discuss the merits of.
To me, and evidently not to anyone else, using a show theme or sample even as a subtle reference makes me class it as 'remix' and I can no longer enjoy it as an original track. And I'm not convinced that adding such a reference makes the track more or less pony than it was beforehand.
Now, I agree that certain stuff gets through that seems non-pony-related at first, but becomes indirectly related (fanon) because the fandom embraces it. The Lunar Republic being the perfect example. And I have no problems with stuff like that.
NLR should not be the exception, that is allowed due to popularity or position. It should be the model; that instrumental songs featured on EqD have to be about as pony related as that. It clearly is, despite its style being different from the show, having no references and even excluding its fanon/popularity. If Glaze's songs did not have lyrics they would be no less pony.
My problem is producers giving their random songs pony-related names/videos JUST so they can enjoy the massive traffic from EqD's watchers. THAT's what I'm so fucking annoyed about.
Oh absolutely I agree with your point. I've made it myself in the past. I guess I hold out hope that, even with no show samples or covers or vocals, it is possible to tell whether the composer was thinking about ponies at the time of writing. It's certainly very hard.
Why do you think Seth is asking people to pre-listen for him? I think he's perfectly capable of seeing how pony-related a track is or isn't, but I think he approached us to filter out low-effort, low-quality submissions. Being pony-related shouldn't be the only criteria, because then you'll obviously get a pile of shit.
Let me quote everything Seth has said on the matter publicly.
"So, I grabbed some guys over at "My Little Remix" to do some pre-listening on all these Octavia/Luna/Spitfire/Scratch songs after some complaints about how "pony" this stuff was. Needless to say, things are a bit stricter now. I got an email the other day saying you wanted me to stress a bit more quality control on EQD with music, and I agree."
"A lot of this stuff (primarily the classical and techno) just isn't "pony" enough. I have been taking anything that sounds "good", and I admit, I slip up on a few. There is also the issue of remixing other stuff and not really changing much."
"The "art" aspect is the part I struggle with on these. Octavias symphony #3944 could very well be someone's special interpretation on Octavia. I don't think anyone in the world can track down every classical song in existence and make sure its completely original though, and I don't think anyone can tell the person their song isn't octavia if they poured their heart and soul into it."If you go by words alone then Seth is asking for pre-listeners to determine pony relevance. That seems more emphasised than quality. This is why I said I'm glad the pre-listeners are ignoring his actual words.