Mr. Bigglesworth wrote:^ that constant, overbearing hum is kinda starting to bug me..
the4thImpulse wrote:'good' is an opinionated word. I have heard very, very, little 'good' pony dubstep so I have to ask; what constitutes as good?
The vast majority is poorly mixed/produced, if you want bulk then just search in youtube 'my little pony dubstep'
and you will likely find a playlist with a bunch of, at best, average songs. Sorry, its just my opinion, even my own music doesn't live up to my standards.
Jokeblue wrote:You fool. You've doomed the Spam thread to yet another, inevitable :3 spam.
Kyoga wrote:Lavender_Harmony wrote: they love to put stereo spread on their subs which totally kills the low end when summed to mono, as many clubs do.
XD you just can't let that go, can you?
Lavender_Harmony wrote:Mr. Bigglesworth wrote:^ that constant, overbearing hum is kinda starting to bug me..
I have no idea what this post means xD
Mr. Bigglesworth wrote:Lavender_Harmony wrote:Mr. Bigglesworth wrote:^ that constant, overbearing hum is kinda starting to bug me..
I have no idea what this post means xD
I mean tracks with too much sub.
Kinda bugs me.
Lavender_Harmony wrote:Yeah, I think drops that just have a sub running constant throughout, especially just a single note, sound awful. They have no dynamics, no impact, no movement.
PYR3LIGHT wrote:The Living Tombstone also has a few (Rainbow Nukestep springs to mind)
Sonarch wrote:I think it would be interesting to have an event based on making some 'good' pony dubstep, and you all could help people with good mixing practices and avoiding all the aspects that make a lot of pony dubstep sub-par. Of course, that could definitely be translated to dubstep in general too...
the4thImpulse wrote:Sonarch wrote:I think it would be interesting to have an event based on making some 'good' pony dubstep, and you all could help people with good mixing practices and avoiding all the aspects that make a lot of pony dubstep sub-par. Of course, that could definitely be translated to dubstep in general too...
Its sub par because very very few people here have the experience to make commercial quality music. It takes most people many years to get to a commercial level. I would like to see it done and I would be willing to help out especially in mixing and mastering areas, but I'm not optimistic it can/will be done.
Sonarch wrote:Well of course, but it would be a nice way to have some people who know what they're talking about actively helping a group of people to make better, but not necessarily commercial quality, dubstep.
Maybe when I get around to trying out dubstep production I could make a thread thing and invite other people to work on/give advice on dubstep in a group.
the4thImpulse wrote:Sonarch wrote:Well of course, but it would be a nice way to have some people who know what they're talking about actively helping a group of people to make better, but not necessarily commercial quality, dubstep.
Maybe when I get around to trying out dubstep production I could make a thread thing and invite other people to work on/give advice on dubstep in a group.
I think it would be best to work with a small group of people, I think the heart of the lesser known album wanted to be like this, artists helping each other. It sorta failed in that regard when it got to big. Get a small group, no more than ten, and you should be able to do something good over the course of a few months.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests