Quix wrote:Granular synthesis involves building sounds from short segments of sound called grains, less than 30 ms in length, as to fool the ear into thinking that it is a continuous sound. You can adjust the length, shape, density, and other parameters of each grain. I find it to be really interesting.
ChromaticChaosPony wrote:I just found a cool new VST called grANALizer. It does whatever it is that grains do.
Anyways, grANALizer (with the right settings) + a comb filter (with the right settings) = megatron-esque robot voice voice (on a male vocal sample
I think I'm only a few steps away from being Excision.
XXDarkShadow79XX wrote:ChromaticChaosPony wrote:I just found a cool new VST called grANALizer. It does whatever it is that grains do.
Anyways, grANALizer (with the right settings) + a comb filter (with the right settings) = megatron-esque robot voice voice (on a male vocal sample
I think I'm only a few steps away from being Excision.
Is it ok if you link to the VST because I can't seem to find it.
Kyoga wrote:why don't you take the megatron voice and do something more unique with it?
Might as well try something new because if people want to listen to excision: They'll listen to excision.
ChromaticChaosPony wrote:XXDarkShadow79XX wrote:ChromaticChaosPony wrote:I just found a cool new VST called grANALizer. It does whatever it is that grains do.
Anyways, grANALizer (with the right settings) + a comb filter (with the right settings) = megatron-esque robot voice voice (on a male vocal sample
I think I'm only a few steps away from being Excision.
Is it ok if you link to the VST because I can't seem to find it.
http://morfiki.blogspot.com/2009/06/gra ... eased.html
Warning: all of their VSTs have sexual themes for some reason. If you are offened by that, here's a list of other granulators:
http://bedroomproducersblog.com/2012/03 ... u-plugins/
XXDarkShadow79XX wrote:Edit: But why isn't Fruity Granulizer good enough?
Kyoga wrote:ChromaticChaosPony wrote:That post was half serious. I have a tendency to automate a lot of available parameters because I love to have non-repetitive, bizzare sounds. I know it doesn't sound good, but I like making certain parts of my music sound bad. I haven't released any songs like this yet, but this is how all of my current WIPs are.
Not necessarily a troll post. More of an experimental technique that I love.
my suggestion would be to simply learn the synth "by the book" and learn what the different types of waves are and what they do.
I would also like to point out that this is the 10,000th post on the Technique thread.
Kyoga wrote:*sarcasm detector detects ambiguous response*
*claiming default motive: Seriousness*
*cue proper reaction statement*
*print*no problem, man! Glad to help!
Kyoga wrote:*sarcasm detector detects ambiguous response*
*claiming default motive: Seriousness*
*cue proper reaction statement*
*print*
Kyoga wrote:*sarcasm detector detects ambiguous response*
Kyoga wrote:*sarcasm detector*
Kyoga wrote:learn a programming language.
do a little research on oscillators and object oriented programming
(more stuff)
Kyoga wrote:XD sorry for the misunderstanding then.
After all, I only have what you type to go with.
Kyoga wrote:I personally use C++
it's not as object oriented.
bartekko wrote:Kyoga wrote:I personally use C++
it's not as object oriented.
I used to program some little tiny things in C++ but then i became a brony, started making music, instead of programs, and now i can't C++, not C, to save my life.
Now I want to learn Max/MSP, because i think it would be easier (YAY VISUAL PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES) and not really less flexible than c++ when it comes to music
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests