CommandSpry wrote:Definetely remove them. Interest in pony music is dropping and fast, because of song overload. Musicians aren't gonna benifit by being put in 10+ daily lists as a youtried star, the system needs a change.
Navron wrote:Before the MOTD posts, there were multiple times through the day when 3-4 songs would get featured.
Now with the MOTD, your higher quality song has a better chance of being paired with 1-2 other higher quality songs, and thus, the attention given to the smaller 2-3 embed music posts is much greater.
The downside is now the standard to get into a smaller 2-3 embed post is much higher, but if you fall short, you're still getting featured in some way.
randomblockfilms wrote:I kinda dont like this idea because the term higher quality song is relative. For example, somebody might not like Kyogas songs because you cant dance to them. And another might argue that Kyogas songs are high quality because they are emotionally moving.
Or you could say that a higher quality song is one that is well mixed and mastered,
Or you could say that a higher quality song is one that has gorgeous chord progressions on a piano that was recorded with a cell phone.
I think that it's not one single element that makes a song good. Its several different elements that are ordered in different priorities for each person which decide whether a song is good or not.
Though it is good to have a top 3 sort of thing so that people try harder and spend more time on their music, rather than have somebody replace the midi of Babs Seed with preset synths in under 15 minutes. But I think that a lot of the time, that extra work will go unnoticed and just be thrown in the MotD because WoodenToaster, LivingTombstone, and MandoPony all released songs in the same day which will dominate the top 3 music thing. Now im kinda bringing in the popularity issue into this because this is also sort of a problem with the music on EqD. (actually i kinda think this popularity thing is world wide) But if they just put all the music in one post, then everyone is on the same level. Just like the DrawFriend stuff posts. But its easier to see whether or not a person put effort into their art than in a song. (Generally) So they need an incentive to make musicians not just release any sort of song. So thats why they make the top 3 thing. and now it sort of just goes in a loop. (well in my thought process at least)
Lavender_Harmony wrote:Not relevant, EqD doesn't vote based on whether or not they nessecarily like the song. That's called bias.
We breakfast is e
Lavender_Harmony wrote:
Not relevant, EqD doesn't vote based on whether or not they nessecarily like the song. That's called bias.
Which is why its a team that does the voting.
It's funny, because songs by 'well known' artists have been ignored in the past because they were crap. If a song is good, it will be featured. Maybe it occurred to you, that the well known musicians are such because they're really good at what they do, just a thought?
______
Interest in pony music is dropping because there is too much of it, and MOTD posts started because there was a) Too many people crying about not getting on EqD and b) Too much music to sort into 3 or 4 song posts in general.
If you honestly hated the MOTD posts, then you would obviously hate the Drawfriend posts too? Being featured as an artist is like having your art used for a header for an article or news post, essentially, or being the top feature of a Drawfriend, it's all the same.
If someone is sriously interested in music, they eventually move away from EqD and find their own sources anyway, so it's all pretty irrelevant.
Lavender_Harmony wrote:It's funny, because songs by 'well known' artists have been ignored in the past because they were crap. If a song is good, it will be featured. Maybe it occurred to you, that the well known musicians are such because they're really good at what they do, just a thought?
Viricide Filly wrote:Lavender_Harmony wrote:Not relevant, EqD doesn't vote based on whether or not they nessecarily like the song. That's called bias.
Hahahaha yes it does, and yes EqD IS biased.
Lavender_Harmony wrote:Viricide Filly wrote:Lavender_Harmony wrote:Not relevant, EqD doesn't vote based on whether or not they nessecarily like the song. That's called bias.
Hahahaha yes it does, and yes EqD IS biased.
Biased towards good content. Do you have proof? And no, your song being rejected isn't proof.
Mundius wrote:Didn't EqD post a very clearly stated non-pony song once because it was by a famous musician from here?
Nine Volt wrote:I doubt Viricide has proof, but in the same vein you don't have proof that they aren't biased. Do you have any examples of EqD rejecting one of Tomb's or Glaze's songs (because of quality, not on virtue of being 'not pony enough')? Hell, even Tomb's Brushie remix got on, and that was frankly not good.
Think of it this way:
If Tomb or Glaze submitted a good song, and some unknown producer submitted an equally good song, chances are pretty good that EqD would choose Tomb's or Glaze's song over the unknown guy's song simply because Tomb and Glaze are well known.
Don't get me wrong, I think you both have valid points.
My experience with Equestria Daily as both a listener and a musician has led me to one conclusion: It’s a mixed bag. Three out of the five tracks I’ve submitted have been in spotlight articles, with the other two ending up in “Music of the Day” articles. If you don’t know what music of the day is, it’s like this: When most of the pre-listeners vote no on a track, it goes to music of the day with like 10+ other songs that didn’t make the cut. A great system, if it wasn’t so inconsistent. The pre-listeners, they’re no OCR judges; most of them don’t even come close to the level of talent and experience the OCR Judges Panel has on average. So what gets spotlighted on EqD and what gets a backseat all too often differs from what objectively should get spotlighted and stuck into the “leftovers” post. A combination of what I lovingly refer to as “popular mediocrity” and a severe slant towards EDM and orchestral music within the pre-listener base overshadows what objectivity and experience there may be. Yeah, they usually get it right, because some tracks are obviously better than others. But sometimes, they slip, and a great rock piece will take a backseat to some mechanical, under-produced attempt at EDM, or an orchestral piece that sounds like a SNES rip.
Freewave wrote:CommandSpry wrote:Definetely remove them. Interest in pony music is dropping and fast, because of song overload. Musicians aren't gonna benifit by being put in 10+ daily lists as a youtried star, the system needs a change.
But the system did change very recently, it was established that the spotlights weren't enough so the MOtD came in. People who are getting on those MoTD are getting quite a lot of views, far more then they would without them so there is a definite benefit there. What you're commenting on is really the glut of musicians and music that exist in the community and also the rush in established acts putting out rushed remixes that aren't terribly inventive (like the first week of 60 versions of Bad Seed that weren't that amazing). Musicians aren't going to benefit from not being seen on EQD so I don't see how reverting back is the solution when the dam has already burst on the volume of tracks coming out. People who are established will continue to likely be fine but EQD is now at least a more fair system for those who were struggling to be seen before.
CommandSpry wrote:Freewave wrote:CommandSpry wrote:Definetely remove them. Interest in pony music is dropping and fast, because of song overload. Musicians aren't gonna benifit by being put in 10+ daily lists as a youtried star, the system needs a change.
But the system did change very recently, it was established that the spotlights weren't enough so the MOtD came in. People who are getting on those MoTD are getting quite a lot of views, far more then they would without them so there is a definite benefit there. What you're commenting on is really the glut of musicians and music that exist in the community and also the rush in established acts putting out rushed remixes that aren't terribly inventive (like the first week of 60 versions of Bad Seed that weren't that amazing). Musicians aren't going to benefit from not being seen on EQD so I don't see how reverting back is the solution when the dam has already burst on the volume of tracks coming out. People who are established will continue to likely be fine but EQD is now at least a more fair system for those who were struggling to be seen before.
I don't feel like rushed remixes belong on EqD at all, EqD should be for the really good stuff. MoTD mainly gives you an opportunity to get some views even on your half assed stuff.
Kyoga wrote:Viricide Filly wrote:
Hahahaha yes it does, and yes EqD IS biased.
If you're serious about this, then why is my dark ambient music making it onto EqD?
This is so far from mainstream that it's not even funny.
Return to Off-Topic Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests