by Navron » 21 Dec 2012 15:21
Sci didn't get his album accepted by UKF Music, despite the fact Sci's mashups are much, much higher in terms of quality than a lot of artists and songs UKF spotlights.
Sci also doesn't make your typical dubstep/electro that UKF spotlights, so it's not just EqD that has a bias, it's the entire music industry.
If you're going to be more progressive, more technical, more meaningful, and move farther away from what the industry standard is for popular music, then why are you all getting mad that you aren't getting views?
You either conform and make the same stuff as everybody else, not conform and be content with the few people that do appreciate your music, or become such an amazing musician that you can both non-conform, and get a large audience.
Don't assume that your, "better chord progressions," means your song is better. In the eyes of the industry, it doesn't matter how good of a musician you are if people can't get into your music easily. Money isn't made from the smaller groups of people that enjoy the musicality behind songs. It's made from the masses of bros and clubbers, and they don't like your complicated music they can't grind or headbang to.
The only band I regularly listen to that would go against that entire problem with the industry, is Tool, but again, it's because they're so good at what they do, they've created a large enough audience to consider them mainstream. So until you can sing like Maynard, drum like Danny Carey, or play the bass like Justin Chancellor, you will always be disappointed with the industry until you reach that level, or conform with everybody else.
That's just the way things work.
DAW: Cubase 6.5, Ableton Live 8
Preferred Genre: Industrial/Trance
Hardware: Schecter Diamond Series Bass, Yamaha Acoustic Guitar, BP355 Effects Pedal, Keystudio 49K Keyboard, Akai APC40, Korg nanoKEY2 25k Keyboard