http://lapfox.bandcamp.com/track/gabberse-town
Ive always been into hardcore techno/ gabber but this song by renard really made me want to try it out for myself
Thanks in advance

cyrricky wrote:Also never ever ever ever use sampled kicks.
Synthesize your own.
cyrricky wrote:Also never ever ever ever use sampled kicks.
Synthesize your own.
Ohffy wrote:@Darkshadow79 ill definently check it out man thanks :D
@Sugarholik thanks for all the information man this is exactly what i wanted to know. Would you mind if i sent you the kicks and synths i make?
Sugarholik wrote:Apply just a little bit of distortion
Sugarholik wrote:Apply LUDICROUS amounts of distortion
cplbradley wrote:I always saw gabber as basically hardstyle at a hardcore tempo, with an overly distorted kick.
Pewter Robot wrote:Just do the process to make a hardstyle kick, but put a lot less effort into it.
XXDarkShadow79XX wrote:Hey! Take that back!
XXDarkShadow79XX wrote:What, because YOU can only make one by accident?
Ohffy wrote:Would you mind if i sent you the kicks and synths i make?
XXDarkShadow79XX wrote:things
Pewter Robot wrote:Just do the process to make a hardstyle kick, but put a lot less effort into it.
Sugarholik wrote:Don't I understand FL, or do you have just a single instance of distortion
Sugarholik wrote:Also I'm not too sure about this 808 and bass boosting business. The bass is important because that's what gives the sound all the weight, but the characteristics of a hardcore kick lives in the mids and highs. Compared to dupstep or something gabber doesn't have the same amounts of bass in it. However if the kick lacks in lows after all the distortion it may be a better idea to blend in the original kick lowpassed or just EQing the thing. If you add different kick it will likely have a different frequency and will just sound messy. But hey, if it blends go nuts with it.
Pewter Robot wrote:Also, for OP and anyone reading: I highly recommend FL Studio for kick synthesis. It is the best DAW for synthesis and effects, in my opinion. I like to make sounds in FL and resample them into Ableton, because Ableton is overall better, but it can't do the same things FL can for sound design, like send a track to multiple different returns, and then send them all to one return; as far as I know, it only has two return tracks. And the native effects, like its EQ, are nowhere close to as good as FL's.
Omegastick wrote:Pewter Robot wrote:Also, for OP and anyone reading: I highly recommend FL Studio for kick synthesis. It is the best DAW for synthesis and effects, in my opinion. I like to make sounds in FL and resample them into Ableton, because Ableton is overall better, but it can't do the same things FL can for sound design, like send a track to multiple different returns, and then send them all to one return; as far as I know, it only has two return tracks. And the native effects, like its EQ, are nowhere close to as good as FL's.
IIRC you can have as many return tracks as you like and you can send them all to one return in Ableton. However, I do agree that it's native effects are a whole lot better. They are more CPU consuming (Ableton's are insanely lightweight) but they are much more practical than the rather obtuse things you get with Ableton. I find myself using vsts more often than the Ableton devices.
Omegastick wrote:Yeah, Ableton's natuve effects suck. Fabfilter VSTs look really nice, alas I am a student and thus poor.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests