Protools ga arimasu, dakara ore no puroguramu wa itsumo shippai da. Fustukamae no yoru, ore no "Musescore" toiu puroguramu wa ore no shukudai o sakujo sureta. Totemo mendoukusakute kanashimikata. Demo, Yojihan ni shukudai o kanryō shimashita.
Did that make any semblence of sence to those who can read/speak japanese? Been just a bit longer than a year since I last spoke/wrote it.
Neither. I've never liked any of the Sonic games I've played tbh. I've played the ones people always cite as the best ones but they kinda just didn't hook me so much. The tv show for Sonic Boom is kinda alright though.
Anyone wanna talk about The Legend of Korra? (I don't think it's ever come up here)
I'm not here anymore, but if you want you can still just call me Mr. BigBagelBoggle!
Funny you should mention that, because I typed a very long message to Jokeblue about exactly that.
Spoilerlots of words:
So yeah Korra has an interesting progression in a way different way than TLA. With TLA the focus is more on how much Aang isn't suited for the world he's put in and how violent it is, what with his dilema with killing Ozai. When Korra is introduced she's perfectly aligned for a violent and dangerous world, she craves it, but her villains aren't almost the opposite in a way. Ozai wanted the Avatar dead because he wanted power, but people like Amon, Unalaq and Zaheer want Korra dead because of their ideals for what they think the world needs, and so far every story has dealt with Korra failing to realize that somehow and ultimately she has to adapt. So Aang is a non-violent avatar in a violent world who has to adapt to that and Korra is a violent avatar in a world of principles justifying violence and she has to adapt to that. They're opposites in terms of their spirituality too, Aang has to learn to be more worldly and Korra has to learn to be more spiritual. The shows themselves are also kind of differently spun, TLA is about its characters first and foremost and sometimes it just abandoned the plot altogether to explore the characters, which I love because by the end of it we had a massive cast and we had time to get to know everyone well enough to make The Invasion as insanely cool as it was, but LOK is more about the story and it uses that to give its characters significance. Instead of characters going and reacting to a fortune teller for developement we see them react to the entire world changing all the time and we learn about them that way. I will say that the dynamic with the Gaang is more interesting than the Krew (nicknames are fun) because everyone in the Gaang had some kind of skill nobody else had. Toph had her 'vision', Katara has waterbending, Sokka is kind of a genius in a way and Aang is the Avatar. The Gaang was a unit that would suffer if anybody went missing. The Krew focuses more on single friendships to compensate, Korra and Asami become close friends and thus kind of become a mini-gaang, Korra has strength and bending while Asami is a genius. LOK also highlights a lot of individual strength, there are plenty of scenes whith characters doing stuff alone as opposed to TLA's scenes of the unit action. That being said they also contrast the opposite way was a result, TLA puts characters alone when it wants to mark out a scene to be different and LOK puts them all together.
Tbh I find it impossible to figure out which one I like better because pretty much every time I do I ramble off on a really long version of the stuff I just said.
All that being said, book 2 of LOK was still kinda meh
Is flaof gonna give Korra a try now? :P
I'm not here anymore, but if you want you can still just call me Mr. BigBagelBoggle!
Skylanders was that game wyere you needed action figures irl to play the characters? Is the spyro thing the same? I think it's an evil idea, but genius for marketing... Then again I don't like thie idea of DLCs... Anyway. I've never played either, but Spyro is pretty cute... so I'll say Legend of Spyro.
I may give Korra a shot, but not before I manage to finish the last Airbender.